« Braddock: An Intriguing Profile in the City Paper | Main | New College Rankings: Pitt, CMU and Penn State Mix It Up »

Comments

Eric E

Sam,
I think you've fallen victim to "outrage about outrage" - which of course is a staple of the blogosphere. These ADP tactics sound like real losers overall, and it's a shame their practitioners haven't learned that by now. And sadly, many, many activists are in it to scream and yell more than they are to have a lasting impact on an issue, because lasting impact nearly always involves the slow, difficult process of building consensus (or breaking a consensus that stymies your progress - see today's defection of one of California's energy companies on the carbon emissions bill for an example of that).

Sue Swanson's post is spot-on in showing that there are a lot of people who deserve more attention in this issue than ADP, because they are in fact working on consensus and compromise. If your goal is to say that zero-cut is untenable, that's likely true. If it's to say that you have to balance the general value of a resource with the livelihood and lifestyle of locals that's doubtless true as well. Just make sure to give the ADP tactics the stone cold silence they deserve.

The comments to this entry are closed.